PUBLICATIONS

ARTICLES

  • Expected performance of the High Energy Particle Detector (HEPD-02) tracking system on board of the second China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite, U. Savino on behalf og the CSES-Limadou collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1063, 169281, 2024, DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2024.169281
  • Gamma-Ray Burst Observations by the High-Energy Particle Detector on board the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite between 2019 and 2021, F. Palma et al., Astroph. J. 960 1, 21, January 2024, DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ad06ae
  • The PMT acquisition and trigger generation system of the HEPD-02 calorimeter for the CSES-02 satellite, M. Mese et al., Instruments 7 4, 53, Dec 2023, DOI:10.3390/instruments7040053
  • Electron Signal Induced by GRB 221009A on Charged Particle Telescope of POES and MetOp Satellites, V. Vitale et al., Astroph. J. 952 2, 159, July 2023, DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ace108
  • Observation of Anomalous Electron Fluxes induced by GRB221009A on CSES-01 Low-energy Charged Particle, Battiston R. et al., Astroph. J. Lett. 946, 1, L29, March 2023, DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/acc247
  • Time dependence of 50-250 MeV Galactic Cosmic-Ray Protons between Solar Cycle 24 and 25, Measured by the High-energy Particle Detector on board the CSES-01 Satellite, Martucci M. et al., Astroph. J. Lett. 945, 2, L39, March 2023, DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/acbea7
  • New results on protons inside the South Atlantic Anomaly, at energies between 40–250 MeV in the period 2018-2020, from the CSES-01 satellite mission, Martucci M. et al., Phys. Rev. D 105, 062001, March 2022, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.062001
  • Deep learning based event reconstruction for the Limadou High-Energy Particle Detector, S. Bartocci et al., Physical Review D 105, 022004, January 2022, DOI:doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003191
  • The first Ground-Level Enhancement of Solar Cycle 25 as seen by the High-Energy Particle Detector(HEPD-01) on Board the CSES-01 Satellite, Martucci M. et al., Space Weather 21, 1 e2022SW003191, DOI:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.022004
  • On the source of the anomalous June 23, 2020 ULF waves detected at both ground and satellite data, Piersanti M, et al., J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2021JA030044, 2022.
  • Swarm-TEC satellite measurements as a potential earthquake precursor together with other Swarm and CSES data: the case of Mw7.6 2019 Papua New Guinea seismic event, Akhoondzadeh M. et al., Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.820189.
  • Fast Dst computation by applying Deep Learning to Swarm satellite magnetic data, Cianchini G. et al., Adv. Space Res. 69 (2), 2022, 837-855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.051.
  • A Critical Review of Ground Based Observations of Earthquake Precursors, Conti L. et al, Frontiers in Earth Science, 6 July 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.676766.
  • Looking for earthquake precursors from space: A critical review, Picozza P., et al., Frontiers in Earth Science, 14 July 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.676775
  • The electronics of the High-Energy Particle Detector on board the CSES-01 satellite, G. Ambrosi et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 1013, 11 October 2021, 165639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.165639.
  • The August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm Observed by the High-Energy Particle Detector on Board the CSES-01 Satellite, Palma F, et al. , Appl. Sci. (2021) 11, 5680, DOI 10.3390/app11125680
  • Trapped proton fluxes estimation inside the South Atlantic Anomaly using the NASA AE9/AP9/SPM radiation models along the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite orbit, M. Martucci et al., Applied Sciences, April2021, 11(8), 3465; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083465
  • On the Geomagnetic, Field Line Resonance Eigenfrequency Variations during Seismic Event, Piersanti M, et al., Remote Sensing 2021; 13(14):2839. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142839.
  • Investigation of the Physical Processes Involved in GNSS Amplitude Scintillations at High Latitude: A Case Study, D’Angelo G, et al., Remote Sensing 2021; 13(13):2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132493.
  • Electric field multifractal features in the high-latitude ionosphere: CSES-01 observations, Consolini G., MDPI Atmosphere, 2021, doi: 10.3390/atmos12050646. 
  • A mathematical model of Lithosphere-Atmosphere coupling for seismic events, Scientific Reports, Nature, Carbone V., et al., 2021, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88125-7.
  • Storm-Time Features of the Ionospheric ELF/VLF Waves and Energetic Electron Fluxes Revealed by the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite, Zhima Z., et al., MDPI Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062617.
  • Auroral oval layers detection by using CSES plasma and electric field data, Cicone A., et al., Il Nuovo Cimento C, 2021. https://doi.org/ 10.1393/ncc/i2021-21117-3.
  • Analysis of the August 14, 2018 plasma bubble by CSES satellite, D’Angelo G., et al. Il Nuovo Cimento C, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2021-21118-2
  • The Electric Field Detector on board the China Seismo Electromagnetic Satellite: In-Orbit Results and Validation, Diego P., et al. Instruments, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments5010001
  • Can an impulsive variation of the solar wind plasma pressure trigger a plasma bubble? A case study based on CSES, SWARM and THEMIS data, Piersanti M., et al., Advances in Space Research, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.07.046
  • Integrating pre-earthquake signatures from different precursor tools, Ghamry E. et al., IEEE Access, vol.9, 2021, 33268- 33283, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060348.
  • Statistical correlation analysis of strong earthquakes and ionospheric electron density anomalies as observed by CSES-01, De Santis A. et al., Nuovo Cimento 44 C, 119, 2021, https://doi.org/1393/ncc/i2021-21119-1.
  • Control and data acquisition software of the high-energy particle detector on board the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite space mission, A. Sotgiu et al., Wiley Online Library, December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2947.
  • Galactic Cosmic-Ray Hydrogen Spectra in the 40–250MeV Range Measured by the High-energy Particle Detector (HEPD) on board the CSES-01 Satellite between 2018 and 2020, S. Bartocci et al., The Astrophysical Journal, 901:8 (7pp), 2020 September 20, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abad3e
  • Beam test calibrations of the HEPD detector on board the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite,  G. Ambrosi et al., Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A 974 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164170.
  • Magnetospheric-Ionospheric-Lithospheric Coupling Model. 1: Observations during the 5 August 2018 Bayan Earthquake, M. Piersanti et al., Remote Sensing, 11 October 2020, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/20/3299.
  • The abnormal seismic ELF emissions in occasion of the 2010 Ms 7.8 Northern Sumatra Earthquake, Zhima Z., et al.,  Earth Sci., 2020, doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.572393.
  • Simultaneous observations of ELF/VLF rising tone quasiperiodic waves and energetic electron precipitations in the high‐latitude upper ionosphere, Zhima Z., et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027574
  • From the Sun to the Earth: August 25, 2018 geomagnetic storm effects, Piersanti M., et al.,  Geophysicae, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-165.
  • Investigating the interminium foF2 variations recorded at the Ionopheric Observatory of Rome during different solar cycles, Ippolito A. et al., J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2020, Forthcoming article, https://doi.org//10.1051/swsc/2020054.
  • The First Pi2 Pulsation Observed by China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite, Ghamry E. et al., Remote Sensing, 12(14), 2300, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142300.
  • A multiparametric approach to study the preparation phase of the 2019 Ridgecrest (California) Earthquake, De Santis A. et al., Earth Sci., 8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.540398.
  • South Atlantic Anomaly areal extent as a possible indicator of geomagnetic jerks in the satellite era, Campuzano S.A. et al., Earth Sci. 8, 563, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.607049.
  • Possible Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling effects prior to the 2018 Mw=7.5 Indonesia earthquake from seism, atmospheric and ionospheric data, D. Marchetti et al., Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, October 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104097.
  • Measurement of the low-energy charged particle background with the space detector HEPD, V. Vitale for CSES Limadou Collaboration, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, (), 1-4, August 2019, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12210-019-00837-1.
  • Scientific Goal and In-orbit performance of the High-Energy Particle Detector on borad the CSES, P. Picozza et al., The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 243:16 (17pp), 2019 July, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab276c.
  • foF2 variations measured by the Rome observatory during solar minimum in the last three solar cycles, Ippolito A., Annals of Geophysics, 62, 4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7762.
  • Precursory worldwide signatures of earthquake occurrences on Swarm satellite data, De Santis A. et al., Scientific Report, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56599-1.
  • Magnetic Field and Electron Density Data Analysis from Swarm Satellites Searching for Ionospheric Effects by Great Earthquakes: 12 Case Studies from 2014 to 2016, De Santis A. et al., Atmosphere, 10, 2019, 371, https://doi.org/3390/atmos10070371.
  • Geosystemics View of Earthquakes, De Santis A. et al., Entropy, 21, 2019, 412, https://doi.org/3390/e21040412.
  • Anomalous seismo-LAI variations potentially associated with the 2017 Mw=7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake from Swarm satellites, GPS-TEC and climatological data, Akhoondzadeh M. et al., Advances in Space Research, 64, 1, 2019, 143-158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.020.
  • Electromagnetic field observations by the DEMETER satellite in connection with the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, I. Bertello et al., Annales Geophysicae, 36, 1483–1493, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1483-2018
  • The HEPD particle detector of the CSES satellite mission forinvestig ating seismo-associated perturbations of the Van Allen belts, G. Ambrosi et al., Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9234-9
  • The electromagnetic wave experiment for CSES mission: Search coil magnetometer, CAO JinBin et al., Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9241-7
  • The state-of-the-art of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite mission, SHEN XuHui, ZHANG XueMin, YUAN ShiGeng, WANG LanWei, CAO JinBin, HUANG JianPing, ZHU XingHong, PIERGIORGIO Picozza, DAI JianPing, Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9242-0
  • Seismo-induced perturbations of the inner Van Allen belt: the particledetector of the CSES mission for the investigation, signed by full CSES collaboration, Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018.
  • CSES GNSS ionospheric inversion technique, validation and error analysis, LIN Jian, SHEN XuHui, HU LiangChen, WANG LanWei, ZHU FuYing, Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9245-6
  • High precision magnetometer for geomagnetic exploration onboardof the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite, CHENG BingJun et al., Science China – Technological Sciences Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9247-6
  • A high-performance electric field detector for space missions, D. Badoni et al., Planetary and Space Science, Available online 5 February 2018, In Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2018.01.013
  • Multi precursors analysis associated with the powerful Ecuador (MW = 7.8) earthquake of 16 April 2016 using Swarm satellites data in conjunction with other multi-platform satellite and ground data, Akhoondzadeh M. et al., Advances in Space Research 61, 2018, 248-263, https://org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.014.
  • New perspectives in the study of the Earth’s magnetic field and climate connection: The use of transfer entropy, Campuzano S.A. et al., PLOS ONE, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207270.
  • Electric field computation analysis for the Electric Field Detector (EFD) on board the China Seismic-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES), P. Diego et al., Advances in Space Research, August 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.08.005/
  • The HEPD particle detector and the EFD electric field detector for the CSES satellite, L. Alfonsi et al., Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Volume 137, August 2017, Pages 187-192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.12.022.
  • Multi precursors analysis associated with the powerful Ecuador (MW = 7.8) earthquake of 16 April 2016 using Swarm satellites data in conjunction with other multi-platform satellite and ground data, M. Akhoondzadeh et al., Advances in Space Research, July 2017,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.01
  • The electronics and trigger system of the High Energy Particle Detector (HEPD) onboard the China Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES), V. Scotti, G. Osteria for the Limadou-CSES Collaboration, 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) – Session Cosmic-Ray Direct CRD- instrument direct, 10-20 July, 2017 Bexco, Busan, Korea, Volume 30, http://pos.sissa.it/301/248/pdf
  • Plasma and Fields Evaluation at the Chinese Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite for Electric Field Detector Measurements, P. Diego, I. Bertello, M. Candidi, A. Mura, G. Vannaroni, D. Badoni, IEEE Access, Vol.5, pp. 3824 – 3833, April 2017,DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2674019.
  • The high energy particle detector onboard the CSES satellite, V. Scotti, G. Osteria, In Nuclear Science Sympoium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD), 2016 (pp. 1-8), IEE, http://ieexplore.ieee.org(abstract/document/8069878/

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING

POSTER

THESIS